PERFORMANCE
REPORT OF Bt. COTTON IN ANDHRA PRADESH
Report
of
State
Department of Agriculture
The GEAC, have permitted M/s. Mahyco
Limited for commercial release of three Bt.-cotton hybrids namely MECH-12 Bt,
MECH-162 Bt. and MECH-184 Bt. M/s. Mahyco have marketed seeds of first two
hybrids in Andhra Pradesh during Kharif, 2002. The market plan given by M/s.
Mahyco to the department and actual sales made by them is furnished in Annexure
-I.
Though the seed was sold to the farmers,
through the authorized distributors/dealers, some of the farmers have returned
the seed to the dealers to the extent of (68) packets.
As against area of (650317) hectares of
covered under cotton crop in the state during 2002-2003, (
3315 ) hectares were covered with Bt. cotton which works out 0.51 per
cent. District Joint Directors of Agriculture were asked to regularly record
observations and send evaluation reports on the performance of Bt. cotton.
However during the month of December- 2002, some adverse news was published in
local media, highlighting poor performance of Bt. cotton hybrids particularly
in Mahabubnagar district.
Keeping in view of the adverse news
published, the department has issued instructions to the entire district Joint
Directors of Agriculture of cotton growing districts for conduct of farmer wise
survey on the performance. The criteria fixed for evaluating performance were
mainly incidence of boll worms and sucking insects, yields obtained and quality
of lint. Besides this
Farmers
feed back as per the survey conducted by the department.
1. Incidence of boll worm : Low to moderate. Incidence was less
during the year and hence advantage
of Bt. Cotton could not be assessed
correctly.
2. Incidence
of sucking pests. : Moderate to high.
3. Maturity : 30 -45 days earlier to non-Bt.
4. Average number of bolls
per plant : 30-32 bolls / plant, which are
and size compared
to 28-30 bolls/plant in other
hybrids. Boll size is relatively small
(3 to 4 grams).
5. Yield : Low yields compared to indigenous
popular hybrids. Majority of farmers
got less than 5 qtls./acre
whereas
indigenous hybrids have recorded
more than 5 qtls./acre
under well
managed conditions.
6. Staple
length : 24-26
mm.
7. Market value : Majority of farmers are of the opinion
that due to short staple length of lint,
less price of Rs.
150/- to 200/- per
quintal of kapas was
offered. Farmers
are finding it difficult in selling their
produce.
8. Intention of farmers for
raising Bt. : Majority of farmers have not
cotton in next year i.e., 2003 -2004. expressed
their opinion
Farmer wise survey conducted on performance
of Bt. Cotton is tabulated in Annexure -II
Performance
evaluation made bv ANGRAU :
ANGRAU authorities have conducted detailed
survey to evaluate performance of Bt. Cotton
Hybrid. Agro climatic zone wise survey revealed
the following:
·
Pickings have been completed in Bt. cotton crop, whereas pickings were
not completed in Non-Bt. Cotton. It may be due to fact that sowings are
generally made in July to August.
·
Net returns obtained by fanners were higher which compared to Telengana districts i.e., Rs.
16750/- per hectare in Bt. cotton.
·
More no. of sprays was taken by the farmers, average 6-7 sprays.
North
Telengana Zone: (
·
·
Cost of cultivation in case of Bt. cotton was slightly more than Non-Bt.
cotton variety.
·
Net returns are too low in Bt. Cotton compared to Non-Bt. cotton i.e., Rs. 4800/- and Rs. 14880/- per
hectare for Bt. cotton and Non-Bt. cotton respectively.
·
90 percent of the farmers who raised Rt. cotton during 2002, have
expressed their unwillingness for raising Bt. cotton during Kharif-2003 for
reason attributed to small sized bolls, poor vigour,
lack of rejuvenation, short staple length, low yield potential and low market
value.
·
Cost of cultivation was slightly more compared to non-Bt. cotton
·
Net returns in case of Bt. cotton were less compared to Non -Bt. cotton
i.e. RS. 2400/- in Bt. Cotton and Rs. 1880/- in
Non-Bt. cotton.
·
The reason for poor performance of Bt. cotton in this zone was mostly
due to crop sensitivity to adverse weather conditions less no. of bolls / plant
and small sized bolls.
·
But in Medak district performance was better
compared to Non-Bt. cotton and other hybrids both in rain fed and irrigated conditions.
·
More than 60 percent farmers felt that incidence of American boll worm
was less. More than 75 percent farmers who raised Bt. cotton
during Kharif-2002 are reluctant to raise Bt. cotton during 2003.
Scarce
rainfall Zone: (
·
Farmers felt that Bt. cotton possessed resistance to boll worm, but
MECH-162 is not having sufficient yield potential on par with Bunny, Savitha, NHH-44.
·
Net returns obtained per hectare in Bt. cotton was Rs.
16800/- and Non-Bt. cotton Rs. 22300/-
Zone wise comparison of cost economics of
Bt. and Non-Bt. cotton is tabulated in Annexure III .
For
Commissioner &
Director of Agriculture
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Annexure
- I
Details of District-wise Bt.
Cotton originally proposed and actual sales during 2002-2003
|
S.
No. |
District |
No.
of packets proposed to supply |
Actual
Sales |
Approximately |
||||||
|
MECH-162
Bt. |
MECH-12
Bt. |
Total |
No.
of Packets sold |
No.
of farmers |
No.
of pockets returned by farmers |
Area
covered (in acres) |
||||
|
Mahyco |
Monsanto |
Mahyco |
Monsanto |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
1. |
Adilabad |
990 |
432 |
20 |
0 |
1442 |
1442 |
861 |
- |
1237 |
|
2. |
Karimnagar |
860 |
276 |
0 |
0 |
1136 |
1136 |
1472 |
- |
1539 |
|
3. |
|
1090 |
436 |
20 |
30 |
1576 |
1576 |
1236 |
- |
1397 |
|
4. |
Khammam |
1040 |
432 |
0 |
0 |
1472 |
1472 |
568 |
- |
710 |
|
5. |
|
945 |
296 |
40 |
0 |
1281 |
1281 |
1294 |
- |
1412 |
|
6. |
Rangareddy |
285 |
216 |
0 |
0 |
501 |
501 |
297 |
- |
506 |
|
7. |
Nalgonda |
600 |
108 |
0 |
0 |
708 |
708 |
391 |
- |
505 |
|
8. |
Mahabubnagar |
440 |
108 |
0 |
0 |
548 |
548 |
340 |
- |
427 |
|
9. |
Vizianagaram |
75 |
108 |
0 |
0 |
183 |
183 |
115 |
- |
162 |
|
10. |
|
50 |
48 |
0 |
0 |
98 |
98 |
31 |
- |
31 |
|
11. |
|
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
100 |
141 |
16 |
139 |
|
12. |
|
100 |
48 |
0 |
0 |
148 |
148 |
110 |
- |
126 |
|
13. |
Prakasham |
100 |
48 |
0 |
0 |
148 |
148 |
93 |
52 |
96 |
|
|
Total |
6675 |
2556 |
80 |
30 |
9341 |
9341 |
6949 |
68 |
8287 |
ANNEXURE - II
FARMERS
FEED BACK ON PERFORMANCE OF BT. COTTON DURING 2002-2003
|
S.
No. |
District |
No.
of farmers surveyed |
Evaluation
Parameters |
|||||||||||||||
|
Incidence
of boll worm |
Incidence
of sucking pests |
Yields
compared to Indigenous Hybrids |
Quality
of Produce |
Market
value |
Intention
of Farmers taking Bt. next year |
|||||||||||||
|
Low |
Moderate |
High |
Low |
Moderate |
High |
Low |
Medium |
High |
Good |
Poor |
Average |
Poor |
Yes |
No |
Without
Opinion |
|||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
|
1 |
Vizianagaram |
58 |
19 |
12 |
27 |
30 |
25 |
3 |
55 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
58 |
0 |
58 |
0 |
39 |
19 |
|
2 |
|
27 |
5 |
18 |
4 |
2 |
5 |
20 |
24 |
3 |
19 |
0 |
27 |
0 |
27 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
|
3 |
|
137 |
95 |
13 |
29 |
56 |
16 |
65 |
37 |
70 |
11 |
0 |
137 |
2 |
135 |
0 |
25 |
112 |
|
4 |
|
967 |
290 |
468 |
209 |
340 |
299 |
328 |
731 |
213 |
30 |
0 |
967 |
6 |
961 |
10 |
37 |
920 |
|
5 |
Prakasam |
82 |
70 |
7 |
5 |
28 |
40 |
14 |
70 |
5 |
10 |
0 |
82 |
0 |
82 |
0 |
0 |
52 |
|
6 |
|
92 |
26 |
33 |
23 |
18 |
42 |
32 |
41 |
36 |
15 |
0 |
92 |
15 |
77 |
1 |
5 |
86 |
|
7 |
Rangareddy |
117 |
26 |
58 |
33 |
0 |
42 |
75 |
117 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
117 |
0 |
117 |
0 |
58 |
59 |
|
8 |
Medak |
12 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
|
9 |
Nalgonda |
169 |
79 |
22 |
68 |
61 |
12 |
96 |
95 |
65 |
9 |
4 |
165 |
10 |
159 |
0 |
0 |
169 |
|
10 |
Mahabubnagar |
129 |
10 |
97 |
22 |
0 |
129 |
0 |
129 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
129 |
0 |
129 |
0 |
0 |
129 |
|
11 |
Khammam |
291 |
37 |
152 |
102 |
55 |
131 |
106 |
150 |
117 |
24 |
0 |
291 |
25 |
266 |
0 |
0 |
291 |
|
12 |
Karimnagar |
585 |
163 |
160 |
252 |
153 |
166 |
258 |
513 |
59 |
3 |
0 |
575 |
16 |
559 |
3 |
190 |
390 |
|
13 |
|
891 |
253 |
204 |
434 |
191 |
198 |
502 |
527 |
314 |
50 |
32 |
859 |
278 |
613 |
51 |
81 |
759 |
|
14 |
Adilabad |
152 |
140 |
2 |
10 |
15 |
86 |
51 |
143 |
7 |
2 |
0 |
153 |
4 |
148 |
0 |
0 |
152 |
|
|
Total |
3709 |
1225 |
1246 |
1218 |
961 |
1191 |
1550 |
2632 |
892 |
185 |
36 |
3664 |
356 |
3343 |
65 |
435 |
3177 |
Index
Yield : Low
- Below 5 qtls./acre KG :
Medium - 5-10 qtls./acre NT : Northern
Telengana Zone
High - 10 qtls and above / acre ST : Southern
Telengana Zone
Market
value : Poor - Rs 1800 to 2000 per qtl.
Good - Rs. 2000 and above per qtl.
Source : District
JDAs
ANNEXURE
- III
Comparative Economics of Bt. and non-Bt.
Cotton in Andhra Pradesh
|
Zone |
KG Zone |
NT Zone |
ST Zone |
Scarce Rainfall Zone |
||||
|
|
Bt. |
Non Bt. |
Bt. |
Non Bt. |
Bt. |
Non Bt. |
Bt. |
Non Bt. |
|
Cost of Seeds |
4000 |
Harvesting
not completed |
- |
|
|
|
4000 |
958 |
|
No. of sprays |
6.9 |
|
- |
|
one less than non-Bt. |
|
7 |
14 |
|
Cost of Sprayings (Rs.
/ha.) |
6935 |
|
5595 |
5890 |
|
|
5150 |
12390 |
|
Average yield (quintals / ha.) |
18.8 |
|
12 |
16 |
|
|
14.2 |
17.2 |
|
Average price per quintal (Rs.) |
2046 |
|
2135 |
2180 |
2015 |
2202 |
1823 |
2070 |
|
Gross returns (Rs./ha.) |
38362 |
|
26501 |
35340 |
|
|
25978 |
35707 |
|
Net income
(Rs./ha.) |
16752 |
|
4798 |
14809 |
2406 |
18782 |
16827* |
22360* |
* Returns after deducting the cost of
seeds and plant protection sprayings.
Source: ANGRAU
KG :
NT : Northern
Telengana Zone
ST : Southern
Telengana Zone